Bare Metal Server Vs Vm Vs Container

Or you could run your apps inside containers on bare metal to get the best of both worlds.

Bare metal server vs vm vs container.

When deciding on bare metal vs. Containers can of course be run on virtualized servers and often are. There is controversy around whether bare metal will vanquish virtualized servers over the long term and running containers on bare metal is still far from mainstream. A vm is a software based computer on a hypervisor.

There are plenty of advantages to running containers on bare metal servers. In this respect bare metal containers give you the best of both worlds. As you can see from the results sample below the copying operations rate was at around 125mb s on the vm in comparison to around 165mb s. As shown below the performance of containers running on bare metal was 25 30 better compared to running the same workloads on vms in both cpu and io operations.

Vm deployment keep in mind that container architecture differs from vms. Containers are an os level isolation technology while vms isolate applications each with a separate os. For one thing this eliminates the overhead of the host operating system or both the hypervisor and the guest operating system if running the container in a virtual machine. Containers running on bare metal are portable between different hosts in a way that non containerized bare metal apps are not.

The performance advantage of bare metal apps with the portability traditionally available only from virtual machines. The simplest and most efficient way to run containers is to run them on bare metal machines rather than virtualized machines. A container is an application execution environment that runs on top of a container engine which sits on an os.